Strategic Studies of Art

Strategic Studies of Art

Symbolic Interpretation of the Role of the Dragon in Iranian Art Iconography

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Professor, Department of Graphic Arts, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran. Email: khazaiem@modares.ac.ir
10.22083/ssa.2026.573422.1120
Abstract
Introduction: The dragon is a recurring and powerful motif in Iranian art iconography, yet it has often been superficially described merely as a demonic creature and a symbol of evil forces in mythology. This study aims to reinterpret and analyze the multiple meanings of the dragon symbol in Iranian art. The central research question is: Is the role of the dragon in Iranian art limited solely to the symbolism of evil, or does it carry broader, more diverse meanings? By challenging the one-sided, shame-centered view, this paper seeks to uncover the dynamic and multi-layered symbolic functions of the dragon across different cultural, religious, and artistic contexts.
Methods: To answer the research question, the present study adopted an analytical-descriptive method. Data were collected from two main sources: written historical and religious texts, and visual evidence from Iranian decorative arts. The analysis focused on examining the symbolic functions of the dragon motif in various domains, including ancient mythology, astronomical iconography, decorative patterns, and Islamic texts (particularly Quranic interpretations of the story of Moses). The study also considered the relationship between the dragon and the snake as its initial form, as well as the symbolic use of the “knot” as a magical or talismanic tool.
Findings: The findings indicate that the meaning of the dragon in Iranian art goes far beyond a one-sided symbol of evil, revealing diverse and even contradictory implications depending on the context:
- In ancient mythology, the snake – considered the initial form of the dragon – was a symbol of health and healing, not evil.
- In astronomical iconography, although the dragon itself is not a planet, it was used as a symbol to indicate specific cosmic situations, such as lunar or solar eclipses.
- In decorative motifs, the entanglement of the snake and dragon, especially when combined with the symbolic “knot” as a magical tool, carries talismanic and protective functions.
- In Islamic texts, particularly the Quranic interpretation of the story of Moses (PBUH), the dragon represents the manifestation of the rod of prophecy. In this context, it is depicted as a protective agent and a destroyer of evil and tyrannical forces.
Thus, the dragon simultaneously embodies opposing qualities: healing and danger, protection and destruction, cosmic order and chaos.
Conclusion: As a result, this study demonstrates that the role of the dragon in Iranian art is not static or unidimensional but rather a dynamic and multi-layered symbol. Its meanings shift in accordance with the cultural, religious, and artistic context in which it appears. Therefore, the dragon cannot be interpreted solely within the framework of a symbol of evil. This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of Iranian iconography and invites further study of other similarly complex symbols in Persian visual culture.
Keywords
Subjects

الجزری ابی العزبن اسماعیل (1380). مهندسی مکانیک در تمدن اسلامی، ترجمۀ محمدجواد ناطق و دیگران، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
 امینی، حسن (1398). جوزهر، دائره‌المعارف بزرگ اسلامی، جلد هشتم،‌‌تهران:‌مرکز دائره‌المعارف بزرگ اسلامی.
خزایی محمد (1388). صورت معنوی هنر عاشورایی در کتاب دومین سوگواره پوسترهای عاشورایی، مرکز هنرهای تجسمی حوزه هنری، تهران: انتشارات سوره مهر.
رستگار فسائى منصور(1383). اژدها در اساطیر به نقل از روزنامه اطلاعات، 24 تیر، ص 6.
گرترود جایر (1370). سمبل‌ها کتاب اول، جانوران، ترجمۀ محمدرضا بقاپور، تهران: انتشارات جهان‌نما.
ماهیار. عباس (1393). نجوم قدیم و بازتاب آن در ادب پارسی، چاپ دوم تهران: انتشارات اطلاعات.
مجلسی، محمدباقر بن محمدتقی (1363). بحارالانوار، جلد هفتم، ترجمۀ موسی خسروی، تهران: انتشارات‌اسلامیه.
میرچیا الیاده (1365). مقدمه‌ای بر فلسفه‌ای از تاریخ (اسطورة بازگشت جاودانه)، ترجمۀ بهمن سرکاراتی تبریز، چاپ اول، انتشارات نیما.
هارتنر دبلیو (1938). نوشته‌های خط اعتدال نجومی کاذب مدار ماه در هندو و تندیس گرایی اسلامی، ترجمۀ آرس اسلامیکا، جلد پنجم، دانشگاه میشیگان.
Al-Jazari Abi Al-Uzbin Ismail (1380). Mechanical engineering in Islamic civilization, translated by Mohammad Javad Natiq and others, Tehran: Academic Publishing Center. 
[In Persian] 
Amini, Hassan (2018). Jozhar, Big Islamic Encyclopedia, Volume 8, Tehran: Big Islamic Encyclopedia Center. [In Persian]
Khazaei Mohammad (1388). The spiritual form of Ashurai art in the book “The Second Mourning of Ashurai Posters”, Visual Arts Center of the Art Field, Tehran: Sore Mehr Publications. [In Persian]
Khazaie Mohammad. 1999, The Arabesque Motifs(Islimi) In Early Islamic Persian Art, London: Book Extra. 
Rastgar Fasa’i Mansour (1383). Dragons in mythology, quoted by the daily newspaper, July 24, p. 6. [In Persian]
Gertrude Jair (1370). Symbols, first book, animals, translated by Mohammad Reza Bagapour, Tehran: Jahannama Publications. [In Persian] 
Fisherman Abbas (2013). Second edition. Ancient astronomy and its reflection in Persian literature, Tehran: Information Publications. [In Persian] 
Majlisi, Mohammad Baqir bin Mohammad Taqi (1363). Bihar al-Anwar’s translation, the seventh volume, translated by Khosravi, Musa, Tehran: Islamia Publications. [In Persian]
Mirchiya Eliade (1365). An introduction to a philosophy of history (the myth of eternal return), translated by Bahman Sarkarati of Tabriz, first edition, Nima Publications. [In Persian]
Hartner W. (1938). Inscriptions of the false astronomical equinoctial line of the moon’s orbit in Hindu and Islamic iconography, translated by Ares Islamica, Volume V, University of Michigan. [In Persian]
Hartner W. 1973), ‘The Vaso Vescovali in the British Museum. A Study on Islamic Astrological Iconography’, in Kunst des Orients, 9, , p.121.